Outbound ip addresses of the Appveyor servers
What is the outbound ip addresses of appveyor servers ? I have got to run the acceptance tests they fail because of the ip restriction set in the application
Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.
Keyboard shortcuts
Generic
| ? | Show this help |
|---|---|
| ESC | Blurs the current field |
Comment Form
| r | Focus the comment reply box |
|---|---|
| ^ + ↩ | Submit the comment |
You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac
1 Posted by turgut.kancelti... on 12 Sep, 2014 08:16 AM
the ip addressees I detected are these below
23.101.129.233
23.101.139.232
23.101.136.22
23.101.132.65
23.101.142.160
23.101.137.199
is there any way to have one ip address for all my acceptance requests ?
2 Posted by Rifat Erdem Sah... on 12 Sep, 2014 08:22 AM
+1
Good Post. Very important feature for security.
Support Staff 3 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 12 Sep, 2014 08:28 PM
Well, every build is always running on a new virtual machine with random public IP. I'm not sure we could easily control this parameter in Microsoft Azure environment.
However, good news is that right now we are working on a new plan which will have pre-deterministic public IPs. It could be ready in 2-3 weeks. For now you could just checking for the range of IPs, kind of
23.101.*.4 Posted by Cameron Taggart on 07 Oct, 2014 06:40 PM
We also need this for security. Any updates?
Support Staff 5 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 07 Oct, 2014 06:49 PM
Making final touches to a new build environment. Will be ready for private testing this week.
Support Staff 6 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 13 Oct, 2014 11:11 PM
Hey guys,
The new build environment is ready for beta testing. We are going to move all paying customers to this new environment till the end of this month.
If you want to be the first to give it a try please let me know and we'll switch your account to new environment.
7 Posted by Cameron Taggart on 23 Oct, 2014 12:53 AM
I can verify that this works great!
8 Posted by Rifat Erdem Sah... on 23 Oct, 2014 08:47 AM
I did not understand how we use this feature. Feodor could you elaborate about this? How can we use this feature ?
Support Staff 9 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 23 Oct, 2014 05:01 PM
What feature do you mean?
10 Posted by Rifat Erdem Sah... on 24 Oct, 2014 07:05 AM
From this post>>>
What is the outbound ip addresses of appveyor servers ? I have got to run the acceptance tests they fail because of the ip restriction set in the application
>>>>>>>>> what I understand is : We will have a specific Ip address for our appveyor application. I want to know how we enable that.
Support Staff 11 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 24 Oct, 2014 07:20 AM
Oh, you can't have a specific IP assigned to your worker, but now it's a well-defined range of worker IPs:
Public IP addresses assigned to build workers:
In CIDR notation:
12 Posted by Rifat Erdem Sah... on 24 Oct, 2014 07:43 AM
Thank you.
That was what we needed as the acceptance test are running in Appveyor. That was a big requirement for us.
Keep up the good work
Have a great weekend.
13 Posted by Karlkim Suwanmo... on 30 Dec, 2014 02:23 AM
Has the ip addresses changed lately?
I saw the ip addresses below from appveyor instead:
173.192.42.20
173.192.42.22
173.193.165.164
173.193.165.166
Support Staff 14 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 30 Dec, 2014 02:26 AM
Added a new host recently - will publish its IPs later today.
-Feodor
Support Staff 15 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 30 Dec, 2014 06:48 PM
Updated docs: http://www.appveyor.com/docs/build-configuration#build-environment
16 Posted by Karlkim Suwanmo... on 07 Jan, 2015 05:40 PM
Thank you!
17 Posted by montgomery.adam on 20 Feb, 2015 10:41 PM
Feodor, you might want to update the SSDT publishing page with the new IPs as well...just spent a few hours trying to figure out why only some of my SSDT deployments were working on my Azure database.
Support Staff 18 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 20 Feb, 2015 11:04 PM
Good catch, thanks! It's been updated.
19 Posted by Cameron Taggart on 14 Apr, 2015 11:54 PM
http://www.appveyor.com/updates/2015/04/13
Hoping the IP range is going to be a bit more stable going forward. I'm very curious about the switch to SoftLayer.
Support Staff 20 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 15 Apr, 2015 12:11 AM
It's been SoftLayer all the time. We switched data center within SoftLayer and unfortunately IPs are bound to DC.
21 Posted by scascarini on 04 Nov, 2015 09:53 AM
I'm picking up some new IPs starting 104 and 108. Azure is rejecting these and so my build is failing.
Could you update the documentation with the new ranges please ? Thanks.
Support Staff 22 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 04 Nov, 2015 10:59 PM
We'll be setting up a router on this new environment to have a single external IP address. What account/project is that?
23 Posted by scascarini on 05 Nov, 2015 08:02 AM
A single IP address would be great. This is the build https://ci.appveyor.com/project/scascarini/nakedobjectsframework-btilm
24 Posted by montgomery.adam on 13 Nov, 2015 04:52 PM
We're having the same issue as before where the SSDT Publishing Page is out of date. If at least all of the
deploytasks could be done through this single external IP, it would help a lot for those of us deploying to SQL Azure.Support Staff 25 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 13 Nov, 2015 05:17 PM
Hi Adam,
There is a link to actual IP addresses range: http://www.appveyor.com/docs/build-configuration#ip-addresses
26 Posted by ericnewton76 on 29 Jul, 2017 02:52 AM
Appears that this link described above no longer publishes the IP addresses.
Also, when publishing the IP addresses, can you also do the correct CIDR notations too?
Thanks guys.
27 Posted by Ilya Finkelshte... on 29 Jul, 2017 03:44 AM
Sorry, we rearranged our documentation a little. Here is the link: https://www.appveyor.com/docs/build-environment/#ip-addresses
Those all are separate IP addresses from different datacenters and cloud services we use, so for each of them
/32is CIDR notation :) We understand that it would be better to have single CIDR-based firewall rule, but to provide better performance and reliability we need to spread across different locations.Ilya Finkelshteyn closed this discussion on 25 Aug, 2018 02:19 AM.