Option to allow PR's to _not_ perm increment the build number

Pure Krome's Avatar

Pure Krome

13 Jul, 2015 01:33 AM

Hi :)

yeah, me again :/

Ok - this is the scenario...

Next build number: 35.

I have master and dev branches.

I have done all my work / team has done all their work and it's all on dev. We are now ready to go live.

To do that, we PR from dev -> master.

This fires off a build/test/no-deploy in AV. So the build number for this AV build is 35. Ok, np.

PR check finishes. all is green. I then ACCEPT this PR. AV kicks off again, but as number 36.

This means, every time I do a release, it always skips numbers.

Can we have the OPTION to not increment builds for PR's. Behind the scenes, this might create build numbers for PR's like : next-build-number + Guid.NewGuid().ToString() or something.

Remember - this is just for PR checks ...... not the actual PR that is committed.

  1. Support Staff 1 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 13 Jul, 2015 09:18 PM

    Feodor Fitsner's Avatar

    Hm, what if that PR is updated and new build kicked off?

  2. 2 Posted by Pure Krome on 13 Jul, 2015 10:28 PM

    Pure Krome's Avatar

    Any time the PR is being checked the build number will not be incremented (if that option is set).

    So if an update to a PR kicks of a CI PR-Build .... then no new increment.

    Only for commits or merges to PR's.

  3. Support Staff 3 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 13 Jul, 2015 10:31 PM

    Feodor Fitsner's Avatar

    So, how to make the version unique this case? Looks like version format should have kind of guid or timestamp or random?

    - Feodor

  4. 4 Posted by Pure Krome on 13 Jul, 2015 10:45 PM

    Pure Krome's Avatar

    correct. because we don't really care about the version number for PR checks .. in my example (above) i just appended Guid.NewGuid() to the end. any random junk can be appended, IMO.. like a timestamp, ticks or guid.

  5. Support Staff 5 Posted by Feodor Fitsner on 15 Jul, 2015 05:34 PM

    Feodor Fitsner's Avatar

    OK, we'll see if that can be done nicely. Would you file a new issue please?

  6. 6 Posted by Pure Krome on 05 Aug, 2015 01:03 AM

    Pure Krome's Avatar

    Soz - totally forgot to add this issue.

    Now added :)

  7. Pure Krome closed this discussion on 05 Aug, 2015 01:03 AM.

Comments are currently closed for this discussion. You can start a new one.

Keyboard shortcuts

Generic

? Show this help
ESC Blurs the current field

Comment Form

r Focus the comment reply box
^ + ↩ Submit the comment

You can use Command ⌘ instead of Control ^ on Mac

Recent Discussions

13 Dec, 2019 05:26 PM
13 Dec, 2019 11:28 AM
12 Dec, 2019 09:36 PM
12 Dec, 2019 09:25 PM
12 Dec, 2019 06:01 PM

 

11 Dec, 2019 11:29 PM
11 Dec, 2019 08:47 PM
11 Dec, 2019 01:39 PM
10 Dec, 2019 12:29 AM
09 Dec, 2019 05:35 AM
07 Dec, 2019 04:20 PM